Search This Blog

Friday, August 20, 2010

The Exorcist' voted 'Most Disturbing Film Of All Time

London, Aug 20 (ANI): Horror classic The Exorcist has been named the 'Most Disturbing Film Of All Time'.
The film has topped the poll for rental service Lovefilm - 37 years after its release reports the Sun.
The story of the demonic possession of a child, which featured Linda Blair as the kid spewing green slime, was rated scarier than more recent flicks such as 'Saw' and 'Antichrist'.
Second on the list was teenage gang movie 'A Clockwork Orange'.
Top Ten:
1. The Exorcist (1973)
2. A Clockwork Orange (1971)
3. Saw (2004)
4. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)
5. Requiem For A Dream (2000)
6. Irreversible (2002)
7. Se7en (1995)
8. Event Horizon (1997)
9. The Blair Witch Project (1999)
10. Antichrist (2009)
(ANI)

Cabinet approves bill to hike MPs' salary

New Delhi, Aug 20 (PTI) Salaries of MPs will be hiked by more than three times with the Union Cabinet today approving a bill over which differences among ministers had surfaced earlier this week.
A meeting of the Cabinet gave its nod to the bill under which the basic salary of the MPs will be hiked from Rs 16,000 to Rs 50,000 per month. However, this is much less than the figure of Rs 80,001 recommended by the parliamentary committee which had said the MPs should get more than government secretaries as the former are above them in the hierarchy.
The Cabinet also approved increase in office expenses of parliamentarians from Rs 20,000 to Rs 40,000 per month. The constituency allowance has also been doubled from Rs 20,000 to Rs 40,000 per month, government sources said.
The limit for interest-free loan for MPs for buying a personal vehicle has been hiked four-fold to Rs 4 lakh from the present Rs 1 lakh. The government also approved a hike in road mileage rate for vehicles used by MPs from Rs 13 per km to Rs 16 per km.
Spouse of a parliamentarian can now travel any number of times in first class or executive class, the sources said. Pension benefits have also been increased from Rs 8,000 to Rs 20,000 per month.
Earlier this week, the Cabinet had deferred a decision on it in view of lack of consensus. The dissenting Ministers had referred to the farmers' suicide and allegations of corruption in Commonwealth Games while making the point that the hiking the salaries of MPs at the moment would be seen in the bad light.

Long-term live-in duos are granted as married

COURTS must presume couples involved in long-term live-in relationships to be married, the Supreme Court has said.
''If a man and a woman cohabit for a number of years, it will be presumed under section 114 of the Evidence Act, that they live as husband and wife and the children born to them will not be illegitimate,'' a bench comprising Justices P. Sathasivam and B. S. Chauhan said. They also quoted a related apex court judgment from 1992.
The bench observed that such sustained association cannot be termed ''walk in and walk out'' relationships and it was for the party opposing the presumption of marriage to prove the contrary in such cases. The bench, which was hearing a dispute over the inheritance of the property of a freedom fighter, Chandra Deo Singh, upheld the right of his children born out of a live-in relationship, to his property.
Singh got into a live-in relationship with Shakuntala, after the death of his wife. His children born out of wedlock filed a case against those born to his live- in partner over the inheritance of property.
The Allahabad High Court ruled against Singh's sons born to his wife. Therefore, they approached the apex court arguing that there was nothing on record to show that their father got married to Shakuntala, who he had been living with after the death of their mother Sonbarsa in 1945.
Advocate Abhay Kumar, appearing for Shakuntala's children, submitted that Singh had been living with Shakuntala for a long time and society had accepted their relationship as husband and wife.
Singh, who was jailed during the freedom struggle from 1945 to 1947, had lived with Shakuntala till his death in 1979.
While accepting Kumar's contention, the bench pointed out that the courts had consistently held there was a presumption of marriage in such cases and that such a presumption could only be rebutted by unimpeachable evidence

Sonakshi shouldn't cross her limits, says mom


As actor-politician Shatrughan Sinha's daughter Sonkashi debuts in Bollywood, her mother says she is free to do what she wants on the big screen, but she must not cross the limits set by the family.
'As an actress, Sonakshi has every right to decide what she wants to do and what she doesn't want to do. It is basically her call. There is a limit for everything and, of course, every family has its own 'maryaada' (rules). We have already told her that we have certain 'maryaada' and she shouldn't cross her limits,' Poonam, an actress herself, told IANS.
Sonakshi, 23, who stars opposite Salman Khan in 'Dabangg', has announced that she is not inclined towards doing any item numbers and has not worn any provocative clothes in the film.
Is that a result of her parents' restrictions?
'Hopefully, when you see her in subsequent projects, you will find out,' Poonam said on being asked about the other restrictions imposed on Sonakshi. She refused to comment any further on the do's and don'ts for her daughter.
Sonakshi is a trained fashion designer, but when Salman offered her a film on the condition that she would have to lose weight, the newcomer jumped at the opportunity.
Poonam said she is extremely proud of her daughter for getting into shape.
'Sonakshi really looked after herself well with her will power. She regularly went to the gym, controlled her food and eating habits which had become very erratic. You know how, as a teenager, kids love to go out and eat. But once she knew she could get a chance in films, she started focussing on her goal; there was no looking back.
'She went on a diet, followed a strict gym routine. She really worked hard and the end product was really beautiful. I am proud of her,' said Poonam, whose last big screen appearance was as Hrithik Roshan's mother in the historical drama 'Jodhaa Akbar'.
Almost three decades ago, Poonam was seen in movies like 'Jigri Dost' and 'Sabak' but moved away from showbiz to take care of her family after her marriage to Shatrughan.
'I have my hands full now. I have a daughter's career to look after and, of course, my sons also. I am a 24X7 housewife and that is why I couldn't take up much work. I did get a lot of offers, but my hands are full,' she said.
But Poonam is open to any role as regal and as one-of-a-kind as her character Hameeda Bano in 'Jodhaa Akbar'.
'If another film like 'Jodhaa Akbar' comes, if I get something like that, maybe I will give it a try.'
She also hopes that some day she will get to share screen space with daughter Sonakshi and son Luv Sinha, who had a flop debut with 'Sadiyaan'.
'I think it will be my privilege to work with my children. This is one relationship where there is no competition, where you would not mind your children walking ahead of you by leaps and bounds. And I hope my children do very well in their lives,' she said.
Poonam's other son and Luv's twin brother Kush is yet to make a film debut.

WASHINGTON (AP)—Roger Clemens was vehement: “Let me be clear. I have never taken steroids or HGH,” he told a House committee in 2008. Now, instead of the Hall of Fame, baseball’s seven-time Cy Young winner could go to prison after being indicted by a federal grand jury Thursday for allegedly lying to Congress. The case writes a new chapter in one of baseball’s worst scandals, the rampant use of performance-enhancing drugs in the 1990s and early 2000s, and leaves Clemens’ legacy in jeopardy. The six-count indictment alleges that Clemens obstructed a congressional inquiry with 15 different statements made under oath, including denials that he had ever used steroids or human growth hormone.

WASHINGTON (AP)—Roger Clemens was vehement: “Let me be clear. I have never taken steroids or HGH,” he told a House committee in 2008. Now, instead of the Hall of Fame, baseball’s seven-time Cy Young winner could go to prison after being indicted by a federal grand jury Thursday for allegedly lying to Congress.
The case writes a new chapter in one of baseball’s worst scandals, the rampant use of performance-enhancing drugs in the 1990s and early 2000s, and leaves Clemens’ legacy in jeopardy.
The six-count indictment alleges that Clemens obstructed a congressional inquiry with 15 different statements made under oath, including denials that he had ever used steroids or human growth hormone.
Former Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, the top Republican on the House panel at the time of Clemens’ testimony, called it “a self-inflicted wound.”
Clemens had been prominently mentioned in the Mitchell Report, Major League Baseball’s own accounting of its steroid problem, and he went to Capitol Hill on his own to clear his name.
“Clemens was not under subpoena. He came voluntarily,” Davis said. “And I sat there in the office with (committee chairman) Henry Waxman and said, ‘Whatever you do, don’t lie.”’
Clemens was sticking to his story Thursday. He insisted he was telling the truth, again denying any wrongdoing on or off the field.
“Roger is looking forward to his day in court,” Clemens lawyer Rusty Hardin told a news conference. “He is happy this has finally happened. We have known for some time this was going to happen. We’ll let everything get taken care of in court.”
“I never took HGH or Steroids. And I did not lie to Congress,” Clemens said on Twitter. “I look forward to challenging the Governments accusations, and hope people will keep an open mind until trial. I appreciate all the support I have been getting. I am happy to finally have my day in court.”
Hardin said federal prosecutors made Clemens a plea offer but he rejected it. Hardin declined to comment on details of the proposed plea deal—which ordinarily involves admitting to a crime while avoiding the scenario of a multiple-count indictment as happened in the Clemens case.
Clemens faces a combined maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine if convicted on all charges. However, under U.S. sentencing guidelines, he would probably face no more than 15 to 21 months in prison.
Clemens is just the latest superstar to be ensnared in baseball’s steroid scandal. All-time home run king Barry Bonds is scheduled to go on trial in March on charges of lying to a federal grand jury when he said he never knowingly used performance-enhancing drugs. Slugger Mark McGwire admitted earlier this year to using steroids.
What once seemed to be a he-said vs. he-said dispute between Clemens and his former trainer, Brian McNamee, once the New York Yankees’ strength and conditioning coach, escalated into a federal case. The grand jury heard testimony from McNamee, who gave federal authorities syringes he said were used to inject Clemens with drugs.
Hardin said that although many have argued that Clemens should simply admit he took steroids, “the problem is nobody ever talks about what he should have done if he didn’t do it.”
“And he didn’t do it and he’s adamant about that and always has been. Today is just another continuing part of that saga,” Hardin said.
Clemens, who turned 48 this month, ranks ninth on the career list with 354 victories. He once was considered a certain first-ballot Hall of Famer, but getting in at all is now in question.
“In my opinion, he’s a Hall of Famer. Period,” said New York Yankees slugger Lance Berkman(notes), who played with Clemens in Houston. “Whatever you want to say about the guy, he belongs in the Hall of Fame. In my opinion, legacy-wise, I guess that’s up to—I mean, 200 years from now, who cares?
“But in the short term, I guess, he may have some things to address,” Berkman said. “He’s a big boy. He’ll face up to whatever it is. But it doesn’t change my opinion of him at all.”
Yankees catcher Jorge Posada(notes), who played with Clemens on two World Series championship teams, said he would back his former teammate.
“I’m going to support him and I’m going to be behind him and that’s all I can say,” Posada said.
MLB did not comment on the indictment. But many in the game saw it as further validation of the Mitchell Report, released in December 2007.
Clemens was singled out by name 82 times in the 409-page report, compiled by former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell. Much of the information on Clemens came from McNamee.
Former MVP Jose Canseco, who has admitted his own steroid use and accused others, was the most-mentioned player in the Mitchell Report with 105 references.
“I am saddened to hear of the indictment of my friend and former teammate, Roger Clemens,” Canseco said in a statement through his attorney. “I am not aware of any use of steroids by Roger.”
Four days after the report was released, Clemens issued a categorical denial in a statement through his agent.
“I am disappointed that my 25 years in public life have apparently not earned me the benefit of the doubt, but I understand that Senator Mitchell’s report has raised many serious questions. I plan to publicly answer all of those questions at the appropriate time in the appropriate way. I only ask that in the meantime people not rush to judgment,” Clemens said.
Clemens and McNamee testified under oath at the 2008 hearing before a House committee and contradicted each other about whether the pitcher had used PEDs.
McNamee has said he injected Clemens more than a dozen times with steroids and HGH from 1998 to 2001. Clemens says McNamee was lying.
“As far as we’re concerned, it’s vindication,” Earl Ward, one of McNamee’s attorneys, said of the indictment.
Clemens’ case was assigned to U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, who presided over the perjury and obstruction trial of Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby. No date was set for Clemens’ initial court appearance.
In his defiant testimony to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Clemens said, “I’ve been accused of something I’m not guilty of.”
Longtime Clemens friend and teammate Andy Pettitte(notes) told congressional investigators that Clemens confided to him that he had used HGH.
“I believe Andy has misheard” the conversation, Clemens responded. He said he had simply mentioned to Pettitte a TV show about three older men who used HGH to get back their quality of life.
Pettitte was taking part in a charity event after New York’s 11-5 win over Detroit at Yankee Stadium on Thursday and wasn’t immediately commenting, the team said.
Clemens was an 11-time All-Star. During a 23-year career that ended in 2007, he played for the Boston Red Sox, the Toronto Blue Jays, the Yankees and the Houston Astros and struck out 4,672 with a lifetime 3.12 ERA.
The Clemens matter was the second referral the congressional committee made to the Justice Department. The other involved Miguel Tejada(notes), who pleaded guilty to making misleading statements to committee investigators in 2005 regarding his knowledge of performance-enhancing drugs.
“The indictment of Roger Clemens comes as no surprise to me,” said Victor Conte, founder of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, the center of a drug scandal that enveloped Bonds and other star athletes.
“In my opinion, the case against Clemens is far stronger than the case against Barry Bonds. Brian McNamee is an eyewitness who will testify against Clemens and there appears to be strong physical evidence against him as well,” he said. “I believe Roger Clemens is in a lot of trouble.”
Conte pleaded guilty to steroid distribution in July 2005 and served four months in jail.
AP Baseball Writer Ben Walker and AP Sports Writers Mike Fitzpatrick, Ronald Blum and Beth Harris contributed to this report.